Yet Another Pointless Tagline
Permanently Uncached header image 1

Entries Categorised as 'Marketing'

SEO and iWeb: Words That Shouldn’t Be in the Same Sentence.

November 1st, 2009 · No Comments · SEO, Web Design

Having written a plethora of articles on how to try and make iWeb more search engine friendly, I often get asked how to improve upon existing iWeb user’s efforts.  Frequently they fail practically every test in the book, and perhaps only once in the last 4 years has an iWeb site been built well enough for me to actually consider that the work put into it might have paid off from the search engine perspective

In reality, I think iWeb masquerades as something it is not.  Either Apple misrepresents it s as a web site building tool, or users get this half-fangled notion that it is more than it actually is.  To my mind, iWeb is nothing more than a half-decent prototyping tool, and at best an over-simplified web publishing application.  It is by no means a professional site building tool and in no way, shape or form should it be considered for building professional and well maintained web sites.  The fact that it rides soo rough-shod over the basics elements of good web design rules it out of that game completely.  It might be FREE, but the consideration that the hurdles it puts in front of the performance of your ‘business’ web site are far greater than the advantages attained from skimping on spending money on a web site.

I understand that startup costs need to be reduced when getting going with a business, but i think there are some actions which take that whole ethos a step too far.  iWeb users seem to be dogged in their mindset of ‘save save save’ at the expense of quality work and the acceptance that getting things done right, at the very least, does require some money.  Even a single well SEO-ed page would be better than an entire iWeb-built web site, unless of course you know what you are doing and can output the best quality work from iWeb, which in most cases, as mentioned above, is unlikely.

If you are intent on working your magic with iWeb, then I insist you do research.  Ask yourself for the answers and go out there and find them.  There are tools for optimising iWeb built sites, but at the same time you need to ensure that you have the know-how to best use them.  Making use of the iWeb SEO Tool from Rage Software is one thing, but really knowing what you are doing with it, is something else, and even then it doesn’t cover every base in the book.  Be prepared to open your HTML files in a text editor such as BBedit and to search and replace the poorly generated code iWeb created.  Moreover, expect to loose ALL your changes every time you go to update your site in iWeb.

Rather than kill an opportunity to find business online with a decent web site, then consider building a prototype of the site you want in iWeb and use it as a means to collect all the content you need for your web site, then hand it over to a professional properly to build, with a mandate to do a proper search engine optimisation job.  More importantly, expect to have a debate with your web developer or design firm about the final design of your site, because any web site building process should be a conversation between firm and client to achieve the best results, both for what you, as a client wants, but as experience tells the web development firm achieves the best results.

What’s Wrong with SEO?

October 27th, 2009 · No Comments · SEO

The true problem with SEO and generic optimisation processes, isn’t the practice itself, though some would have you believe otherwise.  To my mind, the real issue is those in the industry, the majority of whom seem to have their heads stuck so far up their own arses that they can’t see fact from fiction.  Whilst they are busy getting into cat fights on SEO-related blogs, proclaiming that THEY HAVE THE ANSWER whilst others do not, they quickly lose sight of the very real problems of the majority out in the real world.

Before they get beyond themselves, at the very basic level so-called experts need to realize that they are, in part, nothing more than glorified copy writers with a specialist angle in handling content for search engines and the web at large.  Though it’s easy to think that you are tailoring to the search engines, the reality is also that you have to pander to the needs of the potential customers you are theoretically pulling in, and keyword stuffed web sites quickly become a turn off.

Many others are already out there preaching the ways of the new social media revolution, and telling business that they themselves need to engage with the marketing process. It’s easy to think that SEO needs to be completed in isolation of any wider campaign to connect with an audience, but in all honesty it really needs to be part of that.  SEO is a slice of a large pie, a piece of a bigger jigsaw, and SEO ‘gurus’ and their clients need to preach and recognise that respectively.

As part of any SEO process you should be looking at research, content optimisation, content submission, pay-per-click campaigns, content creation, both within your own domain, as well as encouraging others, and not just for the purpose of back links, social media strategy, analysis and tracking of performance.  Before hiring any SEO ‘specialist’ ask about their existing campaigns, look at the performance of it, feel free to ask for graphs and statistics.  At the very least it isn’t hard for an SEO to send you timeline screenshots from Google Analytics.

Most of all, as an SEO service buyer, you should remember that nothing happens fast.  I don’t use this as an excuse to explain why results are slow in forthcoming, but rather to suggest that you have some time yourself to do some research.  Get onto Twitter and search for those talking about the topic, engage with them, build trust and relationships yourself.  Ingratiating yourself will help you learn more about the process and ultimately provide for a more informed decision when you do finally bite the bullet and pay your hard earned cash for those all important results.

The Death of Inbound Links: Who is to Blame?

October 27th, 2009 · No Comments · SEO

With everyone pointing the finger, like in a Agatha Christie whodunnit, it might be time to ask: “is the inbound link and the benefit from them dead?”

With a lot of tech leaders on Twitter these days, and the rest of the world following, much like we did the college kids to Facebook, a lot of bloggers, writers and large traffic sites are seeing a fall in inbound links from other locations.  This affects them because it reduces the opportunity for them to raise their all important page rank on Google and elsewhere.  Ultimately does this really matter though, isn’t the purpose of the content for it to be read? and if you are getting 100-1000-10000 page views a day on an article, isn’t that the key to success?

I suppose it explains why Google and Twitter have recently signed deals with Twitter to include conversations from the real-time micro-blogging service to their search result pages. There is a lot of activity on Twitter, and hubbub that is simply getting missed, and whereby services likely social bookmarking in the past helps coalesce the benefit of group efforts Twitter seems to pretty much ride rough shod over that.

As I famously recall from Science class in 6th year, the teacher shouting across the classroom: “You, Woodhead, are like electricity!  You take the path of least resistance!”  And so it is that people are generally lazy.  Users love Twitter, even if others don’t ‘get it’, because it provides the ease and simplicity, with apps like Tweetdeck, that having to be arsed to write a blog post, such as this one, doesn’t.  Why bother spending 20 minutes or half an hour writing when you can put your point and link across in 15 seconds and 140 characters!

Twitter, Friend feed an Facebook are where A LOT of people are these days.  The advent of the status update has been a real boon for many for whom the joys of blogging would have simply passed them by.  It’s no wonder that @charlesarthur, technology writer for the Guardian newspaper, was reporting only so long ago that 99% of blogs are dead before they even get out of the blocks.

It’s tough, and even I know that and with the ways of the world changing in bound links will become a rarer thing, especially if your blog is at the cutting edge and dealing with technologists.  That being said, I think there is still plenty of meat in the pipeline for those of us who deal with topics that do get real traction and discussion on more static services, such as forums, either at apple.com, or any phpBB hosted board, and as a result there is still plenty of juice out there to be had.

You have to remember that inbound links rely on static content, not the transient mesh of messages that comes and goes in Twitter, and perhaps with few of them out there it might make it easier to discern the quality and therefore raise, yet further, their importance.

UK Economy Loses £1.58bn Annually to ‘Twitter’

October 26th, 2009 · No Comments · Opinion

Apparently it is a slow news day! The entire newsosphere is rolling out the most stupid story I have ever heard.  According to the Toriegraph the UK is losing some £1.58bn in wasted time every year to the likes of Twitter, Facebook and other social media web sites.  On the other hand the London Evening Standard is reporting that Workers tweet away £325m of time in the office.  Who is next? The Guardian? The Times? Will we see it headline on Newsnight tonight?  Maybe that’s why postal workers are on strike? The lack of availability to get in on the time wasting act!

The idea that 100% of time spent on Social Media sites is a complete waste of time is stupid in itself.  For those of us in the IT world, blogging, emailing and social media are essential to our everyday work and personal life, and of course sometimes separating the two is hard, but there are plenty of businesses that are thriving from the benefit of enhanced opportunities to reach their existing and potential customers.  I am not talking about small 1-man-bands with little way to reach out in the past, but medium-sized startups and chains of larger enterprises, even our favourite museums are getting in on the act these days, and in fact entire new service industries have grown up around social media.

Of course there are those who spend more time on Twitter or Facebook at their work computer than they should, but you will never be able to stop them.  To small business the cost of putting in a firewall is as prohibitive as the time lost monthly or annually.  And you will never be able to stop them access those social media apps on an iPhone or 3G mobile attached to a mobile network.  Wireless connectivity is pervasive in the city!

I suppose there is only so far you can go with blocking and monitoring your workforce and of course time wasting should be frowned upon, but to suggest that access to email and social media outside of work should be completely  blocked would be to also shut out a complete world of opportunity.  Moreover, workers are not mere automata, and the more time they are driven to stay in the office, the more ways they will find to connect with the outside world and create a more congenial life.

Maybe it is time that the Brits adopted a more continental lifestyle and accept there is a life outside the office!